Friday, September 16, 2016

Sixty Reasons Six Million Did Not Die


Sixty Reasons Six Million Did Not Die

Here are a few of the reasons why most grown-ups know the so-called "Holocaust" is an outrageous hoax, a colossal fraud and a malicious libel that defames the memory of those who really did die. We'll examine some of these facts in detail below. More people died on the back seat of Ted Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick than in any "gas chambers" throughout WWII.
(1) Insufficient time to cremate more than 400,000 bodies at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Hoaxers claim more than a million were murdered there (after abandoning their claim of "four million" in the 1990s!).
(2) Insufficient fuel to cremate more than 100,000 bodies at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Hoaxers allege more than a million were murdered there.
(3) Insufficient firebrick durability to cremate more than 108,000 bodies at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Hoaxers contend more than a million were murdered there.
(4) Hoaxer claims about improving cremator performance by stuffing multiple bodies into each muffle are refuted by the performance of modern animal cremators and incinerators.
(5) Auschwitz death books record only 68,864 dead, of whom 29,125 were Jews and 31,814 were Roman Catholics.
(6) Auschwitz death books included the young and old who were supposedly routinely gassed upon arrival, thereby demolishing Hoaxer claims that the books were faked by excluding "gassings" as part of a "cover-up" "conspiracy".
(7) Forensic tests conducted on the walls of the alleged "gas chambers" found zero or trace levels of stable cyanide compounds that averaged less than one-thousandth of the corresponding levels for the delousing chambers that were used to save human lives by exterminating typhus-bearing lice.
(8) Hoaxers were so worried about the forensic evidence refuting their allegations that the Polish government commissioned a pseudo-scientific 'study' that manipulated its methodology so as to detect only unstable cyanide compounds, in a politically motivated bid to fix its result so that cyanide levels for delousing chambers were nearly down to those of the alleged "gas chambers".
(9) The absurdity of mass murder conducted by having to drag out 2,000 cyanide-contaminated corpses from an underground "gas chamber", load them onto a 300 kg payload goods elevator that could take only five at a time (say loading, unloading and returning the elevator takes just 4 minutes; then 4 x 2,000 / (5 x 60) = 26.7 hours), and having the 2,000 piled up outside or in the oven room without raising suspicions of the next batch who think they are going to take a shower.
(10) Hoaxers' attempt to rationalize the lack of cyanide in "gas chambers" by citing hosing of walls backfires on them, since "witness" Tauber said only the floors were washed, Nyszili said the bodies were washed, and Bennahmias said the walls were whitewashed with a quick-drying paint after each "gassing". If the first two were telling the truth, the increased humidity would be more conducive to Iron Blue formation. If the walls were whitewashed after each "gassing", the HCN would be locked inside after having penetrated the wall, and cyanide compounds would be found across the interior as in the delousing chambers, yet they are not. Even if the witnesses lied and the walls were hosed, the HCN would have penetrated inside and evidence of it would be apparent.
(11) Hoaxers' attempt to rationalize the lack of cyanide in "gas chambers" by claiming it takes much more HCN to kill insects than humans backfires on them, by the sheer absurdity of the "Nazis" using 99.9% of their Zyklon B to save their prisoners' lives whilst using the remaining 0.1% to murder them (or actually 99.99% and 0.01%, after allowing for the cool, moist, cement / concrete walls of the alleged "gas chambers" being more conducive to formation of Iron Blue).
(12) Topsoil at Treblinka was not disturbed in any extent commensurate with 870,000 corpses buried and exhumed.
(13) It would have taken until September 1994 for the 25 woodcutters at Treblinka to chop, saw and gather sufficient wood to cremate 870,000 bodies, or alternatively, they would need to be capable of attaining a productivity rate 88 times higher than well-fed and well-equipped Italian woodcutters in peacetime.
(14) The impossibility and absurdity of murdering nearly two million Jews by up to 32 minutes of exposure to diesel exhaust with more than 10% oxygen and up to 0.2% CO.
(15) The absurdity of building "death camps" such as Treblinka without any purpose-built crematoria.
(16) The absurdity of a "death camp" such as Auschwitz having a hospital, where Anne Frank was treated for scabies, and the contradiction of routine "gassings" for the sick at Auschwitz whilst Frank was sent to Bergen-Belsen, where she died - not at the hands of any fiendish "Nazis", but from typhus.
(17) The gas bottle at Majdanek with the inscription "1 kg CO2" that was claimed as carbon monoxide - or even "carbon oxide" (!) - by the storytellers.
(18) The absurdity of Himmler becoming so worried in late February or early March of 1943 that the Allies might discover millions of alleged buried corpses in Russia and Poland, including nearly 900,000 Jews at Treblinka, that he panicked and issued an order to exhume and cremate all the bodies as part of a massive cover-up, with the same Heinrich Himmler going on to talk openly about exterminating the Jews in a "secret" speech - and having it recorded so that it could be used as evidence against him (!) - at Posen later that year, on 4 October, 1943.
(19) The impossibility of 2,955 Einsatzgruppen - including the clerks - identifying and selecting 2 to 3 million Jews in a war zone out of an enemy population of tens of millions (by using callipers to measure their noses, or asking to see if they were circumcised?), shooting all those Jews without being killed themselves, and then eliminating millions of corpses without Allied aircrew seeing the flames and smoke from open-air cremations.
(20) The contradictory juxtaposition of 'honest' witnesses with so many 'witnesses' who are proven liars, e.g., it was "real in their mind", they repeatedly swallowed and defecated diamonds for two years, they were "raised by wolves", skin turned "blue" when Jews supposedly died from CO or cyanide poisoning, etc..
(21) The non-mention of "gassings" in encrypted communications and private diaries.
(22) The lack of any "Hitler order", or any budget, blueprint or central office for an "extermination" program.
(23) The impossibility of communicating a system of "code words" and "euphemisms" by telepathy or semaphore for "covering up" genocide that could be followed religiously, without a single blunder.
(24) The improbability that no German would take a photograph of a "gas chamber", and the impossibility of communicating an order not to do so by telepathy or semaphore.
(25) The improbability that the Germans would be able to instantly cremate all "gassed" victims whilst leaving victims of natural deaths piled up outside, so that Allied doctors conducting autopsies would never find evidence of death by poison gas, and the impossibility of ordering such a "cover-up" by telepathy or semaphore.
(26) The absurdity of the claim by Charles Bendel, a Jewish "medical doctor", that "German methods" would allow 1,000 people to fit into a "gas chamber" of 10 m x 4 m x 1.6 m = 64 cubic meters = 64 liters per person, which is a packing density of 55 / 64 = 0.859 if the average person weighed only 55 kg and had a density equal to that of water.
(27) The attempt to mislead by producing a fraudulent documentary in which a young redhead goes to Treblinka and becomes tearful, after pretending to think a cemetery with forty bone fragments is a mass grave and a pierced mullet star brand mark of a porcelain factory is a "Star of David".
(28) The requirement for the Soviets to construct a "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I after the war, in order to sell the legend to unsuspecting tourists.
(29) Lies about "death camps" in Germany proper, and the requirement to fall back on the claim that the "death camps" 'coincidentally' just happened to be situated behind the Iron Curtain, where Stalin and Beria had control of who was allowed to look at the 'evidence'.
(30) After the claim of a "gas chamber" at Dachau was shown to be a lie, the attempted cover-up by pretending that the Germans had been attempting to build the "gas chamber" for three years, but never completed the project even though "work was going on at a high speed".
(31) The impossibility of utilizing mortuary 1 of Krema II (allegedly responsible for most of the Auschwitz-Birkenau "gassings") as a "gas chamber", when there were no input holes in the ceiling for the introduction of Zyklon B at the time that the "gassings" were supposedly taking place.
(32) The absurdity of building a "gas chamber" for mass murder with flimsy wooden doors that opened to the inside, where bodies would be piled up.
(33) The absurdity of converting an underground morgue into a "gas chamber" by chiseling out square holes for the introduction of Zyklon B granules.
(34) Lies about mass murder by quicklime / vacuum chambers / steam chambers / a "building where the floor was electrified in a special way" / pedal-operated brain-bashing machines / masturbation machines / atomic devices for vaporizing 20,000 Jews / Jew-eating bear and Jew-pecking eagle / being made to climb trees that would be chopped down / being pushed off cliffs, etc..
(35) Lies about Jews being made into soap, knife cases, light switches, lampshades, shrunken heads, saddles, riding breeches, gloves, house slippers, ladies' handbags, and book-binders.
(36) Lies about flames shooting out of the crematory chimneys.
(37) The requirement for Hoaxers such as Raul Hilberg to spend a lifetime trawling through documents in the hope of finding something that could be deliberately misinterpreted as 'evidence' for extermination, and then not being able to come up with anything more incriminating than verbs such as "ausrotten".
(38) Hitler's remark of November 10, 1938, about needing to "annihilate" the class of German intellectuals, Himmler's statement (as quoted by his masseur, Felix Kersten, in a diary entry dated December 12, 1940) that Hitler wanted to "wipe out the Jews", and Himmler's statement of April 18, 1941 (according to Kersten) that "The Jews must be annihilated by the end of the war" - before Hoaxers contend any decision had been made to "exterminate" the Jews.
(39) The requirement to have dozens of "Holocaust museums" around the world to sell the story.
(40) There's no business like Shoah business.
(41) Lying about "six million" dead, fictitious "gas chambers" and about most or all Jews being of Semitic origin - when nearly all are from the Caucasus as proved by Elhaik (2012) - is a price worth paying for being handed your own sovereign state and 8,000 square miles of land, when your religion tells you that you are "God's Chosen People" and its Talmudist 'ethics' encourages lying, cheating, thieving, raping and killing, provided the "goyim" (non-Jews) are the victims. Christians - or even atheists brought up in a Christian White European culture - are particularly susceptible to falling for the Hoax, since their ethics is the polar opposite of the Talmudists. They find it hard to believe that "witnesses" would lie about an event of such importance, and so they tend to take the "witnesses" at face value and to ignore the material facts.
(42) The requirement for Hollywood and the mass media to devote a vast amount of coverage to the "Holocaust", Hitler and the "Nazis", whilst having very little to say about Mao Zedong and Stalin, whom even Hoaxers concede killed more than Hitler.
(43) Relentless whining and moaning about being hard done by, and extorting massive reparations, is inconsistent with the actions of people who have truly suffered great losses, yet is consistent with lying shysters who fabricated a hoax for political and business purposes.
(44) 'Confessions' obtained by crushing testicles, breaking jaws, tearing out fingernails, beating with clubs and brass knuckles, etc., along with a desire to protect one's family from reprisals.
(45) The Jewish "German" communist Bruno Baum admitted to being one of the main fabricators of propaganda at the Auschwitz camp. He said, "It is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda, which was spread at that time all over the world, was written by ourselves in the camp. [...] We carried out this propaganda in [for] the world public until our very last day of presence in Auschwitz."
(46) Dr. Arno J. Mayer, a Jewish "historian", tried to explain away the absence of evidence by stating, "Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable. Even though Hitler and the Nazis made no secret of their war on the Jews, the SS operatives dutifully eliminated all traces of their murderous activities and instruments. No written orders for gassing have turned up thus far. The SS not only destroyed most camp records, which were in any case incomplete, but also razed nearly all killing and crematory installations well before the arrival of Soviet troops. Likewise, care was taken to dispose of the bones and ashes of the victims."
(47) Simone Veil, a Jewish "French" politician who survived the Auschwitz "factory of death", tried to explain away the absence of evidence by stating, "Yet everyone knows that the Nazis destroyed these gas chambers and systematically eradicated all the witnesses."
(48) There is a contradiction between systematically eradicating all the witnesses and releasing 20,000 inmates from Majdanek, who would be witnesses to the cruelty if it were a "death camp".
(49) Mainstream sources recognize that Simon Wiesenthal was a "liar and a fraud", who lied about nearly everything in his life. He had numerous contradictory versions of his wartime exploits, which are so far fetched that they are virtually a benchmark test of gullibility.
(50) A previous claim by Jews - in their Babylonian Talmud - that "four billion - or as some say, forty million" - Jews were exterminated by the Romans at Bethar, and there was so much blood, it was up to the horses' nostrils, and it was enough to move stones the size of 40 se'ah (293 liters) and to flow into the sea for a distance of four miles.
(51) Hitler's true policy - of expelling the Jews from Germany - was entirely consistent with previous expulsions of Jews from more than 100 locations throughout history, when the host population threw out Jews after becoming aware of their subversive nature and their destructive effect on the host nation's culture and civilization. There has never been any singling out of Jews for "extermination", which is why their population remains around 15 million today.
(52) Rabbi Stephen Wise's statement of June 10, 1900, as reported in the Jewish-owned New York Times the next day, "There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism", at a Federation of American Zionists meeting at Cooper Union in Manhattan.
(53) The 'prediction' by Joseph Seff, President of the Federation of Ukrainian Jews in America, as reported in The New York Times of September 8, 1919, of "This fact that the population of 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and in Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated".
(54) The 'prediction' by Jews, as reported in The New York Times of July 20, 1921, that "Russia's 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre".
(55) Rabbi Wise's claim, reported in The New York Times of April 18, 1938, that "millions of Jews are dying today".
(56) The allegation by "spokesmen" for Rabbi Wise's World Jewish Congress, as reported in The New York Times of June 30, 1942, that Jews "were being shot by firing squads at the rate of 1,000 daily" and "1,000,000" had already been "slain by Nazis".
(57) Soviet Jewish communist Ilya Ehrenburg's announcement in Soviet War News as early as December 22, 1944, months in advance of the war's end, that the Germans had "annihilated six millioninnocent people", together with claims prior to that by other Jews that "close to six million" Jews had been killed.
(58) The failure of the "six million" headline claim to be revised accordingly in the 1990s when the alleged Auschwitz death toll was revised downwards from four million to between one million and one-and-a-half million.
(59) The admission by honest Jews such as Gerard Menuhin (son of violinist Yehudi), Paul Eisen, Roger Dommergue, David Cole and Joseph G. Burg that the Holocaust tale is false.
(60) The requirement to prop up the official narrative by blowing up and killing François Duprat and crippling his wife, kicking in Prof. Robert Faurisson's face, attempting to murder Ernst Zundel byburning down his house and sending a pipe bomb in the post, threatening and beating up David Cole and other revisionists, ordering the blocking of certain websites in Hungary, making criticism of the "Holocaust" narrative an imprisonable offense in most European countries and even detaining and extraditing Germans from Canada and the US for criticising the fable, sentencing an 87-year-old grandmother to jail several times for saying she did not believe Auschwitz was a "death camp", and even jailing defense lawyers for defending their revisionist clients too well. Truth needs no laws to protect it.
Now let's examine some of the evidence in more detail.

Read the rest here.

Saturday, June 25, 2016

Holyhoaxer Joseph Hirt, who had a his arm tattooed with a fake "Auschwitz number", is exposed as a liar and admits he fabricated his entire story

Joseph Hirt, showing his fake tattoo

Joseph Hirt is an 86 year old jew originally from Poland, now living in Pennsylvania, USA, and a former psychologist.

For years he traveled on the Holyhoax circuit, speaking to young children at schools and others at church groups and other orgnizations, telling them yarns about the horrors of the Shoah™ .

Joe's story was that he was imprisoned in Auschwitz as a 6 year old boy, met Dr. Mengele at the camp, and escaped by crawling under the electric fence one snowy night.  As a bonus, he also claimed to have personally seen track star Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin and later met him in the United States.

Hirt even had a tattoo put on his arm to fake a genuine concentration camp number tattoo (see picture above).

Joe would tell captivated audiences how he "still had nightmares" where he was still running and escaping from Auschwitz.  Many of the people who heard Joe's story would have nightmares themselves, and think to themselves, "It's hard to believe this happened".  Boy, were they right!

Then, in 2016, a history teacher became suspicious of Hirt's story and published an article refuting many of Hirt's claims as false.  Oy Vey!  Unable to dispute this expose, Joe then publicly admitted that he fabricated his entire story and was never a prisoner in Auschwitz.

Joe attempts to justify his lies by saying that he was motivated to lie out of his fear "that the history and horror of the camps would be forgotten" and to "keep the memories alive".

Yes, Joe, if it weren't for all the lies of the Holyhoaxers, there would be no "horror of the holocaust".

Via Daily Stormer

Source Article: Guardian: "Man who claimed to have escaped Auschwitz admits he lied for years"

2014 Version of Hirt's story (Article): "Holocaust survisor Joseph Hirt to speak at Caernarvon Fire Hall on Feb. 26"

Another 2014 version of Joe's story: "Holocaust survivor recounts escape from Auschwitz to Lancaster County community"

Note: use to find articles if original links no longer work.

Listen to Joe tell his yarn (before he admitted it was all a lie).  Note in this version of his tale, he claimed to be "89 years old" back in 2014!

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Brave and beautiful German woman apologizes to her mother for believing the Holyhoax lie

Title of video in YouTube: "Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust"

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Half a million children lured into the gas chambers at Majdanek "by giving them sugar and chocolate"!!

This Holohoax propagandist, errr I mean "eyewitness", says that the Majdanek camp had separate homicidal gas chambers exclusively used to mass murder children, and that the children were "lured into the gas chambers by giving them sugar and chocolate".

Uh huh.  Sure.

Let's remember that the jewish liars initially claimed that "1.5 million" people were murdered at Majdanek, only to years later revise this claim (like almost every other aspect of the Holyhoax yarn), and currently claim that only "79,000" died at the camp.

See also:

The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth (Documentary film)
Majdanek: Initially "officially" claimed to be a "death camp" where 1.5 million murdered; Now only 79,000 alleged dead
Mietek Grocher escapes Majdanek gassum chamber by walking backwards while guards weren't looking

Thursday, April 28, 2016

New documentary by Eric Hunt: "Questioning The Holocaust - Why We Believed"

Title of video in YouTube: "Questioning The Holocaust - Why We Believed (Part 1 of 2)"

Monday, April 4, 2016

Interview with Germar Rudolf, November 2015

Title of video in YouTube: "Germar Rudolf Jim Rizoli interview November 2015"

R.I.P. Bradley Smith


Dear friends and supporters:

A short while ago we were informed that Bradley R. Smith passed away at the VA hospital in San Diego on this Thursday, February 18, 2016. He succumbed to lymphoma in conjunction with congestive heart failure. We volunteers at CODOH mourn the passing of our Committee's founder, but will continue his work true to his legacy. May he rest in peace.

You may also read CODOH'S obituary series here.

Please either leave your eulogies using the comment function below, and/or send your condolences by mail to the family at:

Irene Altamirano Smith
PO Box 439016
San Ysidro CA 92143

Germar Rudolf

Notable eulogies and comments:

Feb. 20, 2016, 2:23 a.m.| Dino Vettri
You did your part, honorable Lord Smith, you opened many minds who now think, instead believe. You are a special part of Dasein. The True is prevailing although many of its enemies work hard to deceive it, and soon Holocaust will be just to be remembered as a Horrible Myth, and we the Goym its real victims. You are on us and we all shall continue to pursue the True for the sake of humanity and universe, and build a better world.

Feb. 20, 2016, 11:56 a.m.| Hannover (
Everyone who values free speech should carry a heavy heart. Bradley was a personal friend and I am particularly saddened. Quite the man. Will see him in Valhalla.

Thank you dear Sir for your efforts, your struggle for mankind. May you rest in peace with your forefathers. I hope that I can meet you one day, to shake your hand. Kindest regards, Lasse Karagiannis, Sweden

Feb. 20, 2016, 9:53 p.m.| Ed Baker
Rest in peace Bradley and please know that you will not be forgotten. Your work goes on and dedicated CODOH people will make sure that truth will prevail. You will be missed.

Feb. 21, 2016, 12:20 a.m.| Juergen Graf
Dear Irene, dear Paloma, Bradley was one of the kindest persons I ever met. He was a true idealist and a fundamentally decent man who will not be forgotten. I will always remember my visit to your home in spring 2000. Please accept my heartfelt condolences. I trust we will meet again some day in the future. Your friend Juergen Graf and his wife Olga

Feb. 21, 2016, 4:55 a.m.| UK Aryan
RIP Mr Smith. We are forever indebted to the hard work you have done in search of the truth. Condolences to all family and friends. A true legend of modern day has passed. RIP

Feb. 21, 2016, 6:47 a.m.| Rafael
I'm really sorry for the loss of Mr. R. Smith. He was one of the most active revisionists till today that I've heard from. I wasn't lucky enough to meet him personally, but I'm sure he was a wonderful person, as well as a very hard worker. From Spain I read his fantastic reports every month. We have lost a veteran truth seeker. Hope CODOH continues the legacy of their founder Mr. R. Smith. Neither prison nor death will stop truth. The best way to keep the memory of Mr. R Smith in my opinion is to fight even harder for the cause he dedicated himself. Strength & Victory! May R. Smith rest in peace.

Feb. 22, 2016, 1:02 p.m.| Truthy1
The truth shall set us free. The seeds of truth have been planted for all to nourish and help to become fruitful. The pits of deception have also been given ground to work from. We are the tenders and propagators of righteous disclosure. Rest In Peace Bradley R. Smith

Feb. 24, 2016, 2:32 p.m.| Donar Thorson
Hail Kinsman, I did not know you yet I admired you and your lone stand did not go unnoticed. The fight for truth go on. Thank you for your consistent effort - one day the truth will prevail, IT WILL

Feb. 24, 2016, 9:47 p.m.| Nigel Jackson
Here is my tribute to Bradley: SANDGRAIN --- In memoriam: Bradley Smith --- You have to imagine a grain of sand - Held in your palm, suddenly speaking - While all the others along the beach - Look the other way and keep very quiet. --- To see eternity in a grain of sand - Is not as easily done as it can sound, - With all respect to William Blake, - That white-haired old prophet - Who would have understood Bradley Smith very well - And told him not to keep his trap shut! --- Speaking truth is a dangerous occupation. - You can so easily be brought up before a Pilate - And given the whole treatment before execution, - While journalists keep a deathly silence - And celebrities grovel before the latest sophistry. - Nothing easier than to ridicule the prophets! --- Bradley Smith is dead. A humble, cheerful, - Quizzical sort of chap who liked to cock his snook - At all sorts of hypocrites, spongers, bullies, liars. - He preferred the fresh air of speaking truth, - Letting the spirit blow where it would like wind, - And called on many a Nicodemus to be born anew. --- He had a Mexican wife, a sense of humour also - Rather Mexican, you’d think. He was quirky, blunt - And challenging, a bit of an egocentric too; - But he spoke the needed truth when others quailed. - Just another of God’s smiths, I feel; - But he put to shame the times-servers, lickspittles, - Craven camp followers, turncoats, brown noses, boors. - Salute him, for he rose above himself! --- by NIGEL JACKSON, 25th February 2016

Feb. 25, 2016, 10:02 a.m.| ASMarques
From Portugal, my condolences to Bradley Smith's family. Not knowing how exactly Thought could translate itself into words (as Smith would have put it), I once compared the indefatigable prof. Faurisson to a one man army that managed to trash enormously powerful ennemies against all odds, by the sheer power of ideas and the physical courage to pay the price of victory. In the same spirit, I would say Bradley Smith was the equivalent of a victorious one man guerrilla insurrection conducted on a shoestring and still spelling doom to the same formidable enemy in the name of the First Amendment to the US Constitution. He was a quintessential American hero to many all over the World and a great writer to those who were lucky enough to read him. He will be sorely missed.

Prominent members of Truth in History movement eulogize Bradley Smith:

  • Bradley Reed Smith – Our Hero, by Germar Rudolf
  • Remembering Bradley R. Smith, by Richard Widmann
  • Remembering Bradley, by Ernst Zündel
  • Farewell to an Optimist, by David Cole
  • A Life That Made a Difference, by Arthur R. Butz
  • Bradley Smith, by Robert Faurisson
  • Remembering Bradley Smith, by Mark Weber
  • Losing a Wise Friend, by Germar Rudolf

Sunday, March 13, 2016

The myth of homicidal gas chambers. The only gas chambers at the camps were disinfestation chambers used to kill lice! Forensic analysis of alleged gas chambers in the camps proves there was no mass murder

Did the Germans really mass murder millions of people in gas chambers?

The current official kosher narrative

At this time, proponents of the official "holocaust" mythology claim there were only 6 "extermination camps" which utilized homicidal gas chambers, all of which are located in modern-day Poland -- Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Chelmno.  All of these camps were located in the Soviet occupation zone after the war, and access for Western press and media for investigation was not allowed.  Of these six camps, four were completely demolished before the end of World War Two.  Only Auschwitz and Majdanek were left standing, and could be forensically examined.  As will be discussed below, forensic examination proves that there were no "homicidal gas chambers" at these two camps.

It is currently admitted even by kosher historians that there were no "death camps" or camps that used homicidal gas chambers located on German soil.  The truth is that none of the German-run camps, including those in Poland and Austria, were death camps.  They were merely internment and slave labor camps, similar to camps on American soil where the U.S. Government interned Americans of Japanese, German, and Italian ancestry during the war.

Robert Faurisson and other "revisionist" historians and researchers begin to break down the official orthodoxy

Beginning the 1970s, researchers such as professor Robert Faurisson (pictured left) began to question the kosher narrative of the supposed "holocaust" that was then becoming popularized by the jewish-controlled press and media, and Hollywood.

The research of Faurisson, now acknowledged to be the world's foremost revisionist scholar, exposed the allegations of "homicidal gas chambers" to be a lie, and has inspired and lead to further research by many other brave researchers (who have often faced persecution and imprisonment), which has fully destroyed the lies of the alleged "holocaust".

Damning lies - The Allies initially claimed that there were homicidal gas chambers at camps now admitted to not being death camps - including Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald

Pictured at left is a U.S. Army photograph of the door of a gas chamber at Dachau.  Initially after the war, the U.S. Army claimed that inmates were mass murdered in gas chambers at Dachau.  They even produced a "documentary" video alleging this.  Later, these claims were retracted, and since approximately 1960 it has been "officially" recognized by even proponents of the kosher Holyhoax fable acknowledge that no extermination took place at Dachau.  There were four gas chambers at Dachau.  But they were delousing or disinfestation chambers used to disinfect clothing of inmates in order to prevent typhus and other diseases.

The Allies presented "evidence", including supposed "eyewitness testimony" and the "confessions" of top Nazis, at Nuremberg and other trials allegedly proving the use of homicidal gas chambers and extermination at camps such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald -- all camps located on German soil.  But these were all lies.  This is damning smoking gun evidence proving that the Allies have intentionally lied about the purpose of the gas chambers.

The truth?  The only gas chambers at the German-run camps were DELOUSING fumigation chambers used to disinfect clothing

The German-run camps did have gas chambers.  But they were never used to kill a single person.  They used an insecticide, cyanide gas, to fumigate clothing in order to kill lice and other pests and prevent the spread of typhus and other diseases.  The picture at left shows one of four delousing gas chambers at the Dachau concentration camp. [1]

Why shave their heads?  Inmates' clothing was taken and their heads were shaved to prevent spread of lice and disease

What would be the purpose of shaving inmates' heads immediately before sending to them to the gas chambers to die?  This is a photograph of prisoners at Birkenau given new uniforms to wear after their clothes were taken.  This is a sanitary measure done at prisons to this day.

Zyklon B is an insecticide, and not used by the Germans to exterminate anyone.  Only to kill lice!

Zyklon B was the trade name of a cyanide-based pesticide invented in Germany in the early 1920s. It consisted of pellets or granules that released a poisonous gas when exposed to water and heat. It was used in the camps to delouse (disinfect) clothing, killing lice and other pests that carry disease.

Are piles of shoes or clothing "proof" of mass murder?

This is a pile of shoes at the Dachau concentration camp.  As explained previously, the Dachau camp was not an extermination camp.  The only gas chambers at Dachau, or any other German-run camp, were delousing chambers used to disinfect clothing and other items.  As done at prisons to this day, inmates are given new clothing and shoes upon entering the prison.  This is the reason for piles of clothing and shoes.  Not a sinister agenda to murder the inmates.

Are crematory ovens evidence of genocide?  Of course not

The picture at left shows inmates at the Dachua concentration camp demonstrating the use of the crematory oven with a real corpse.  Modern-day prisons contain crematory ovens.  As a method of disposal of a corpse, cremation no more offensive than burial.  Cremation was preferable to burial as a sanitary measure.  And by the way, as demonstrated by Holyhoax deniers, there were nowhere near enough crematory ovens at the camps to dispose of 6 million bodies.

What about the alleged Nazi "confessions" to the use of gas chambers?

Top Nazi officers, such as Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss , were tortured into giving false confessions.  Many of them, such as Höss, have vague and technically impossible "confessions" regarding the alleged use of homicidal gas chambers.  For instance, many of them claim that after the people were killed in the gas chambers, the bodies were "immediately" removed.  As Robert Faurrison explains, this is impossible, because it takes approximately 20 hours to remove Zyklon B gas from a room, even with use of ventilation systems, as is documented in the technical use literature for Zyklon B (when used for disinfection to kill vermin).

What about the supposed "eyewitness testimony" of the existence of homicidal gas chambers?

Purported inmates and witnesses to the "holocaust" have given testimony that homicidal gassings took place at camps which are now admitted by even kosher historians to have not been extermination camps - including Dachau, Buchenwald, and Bergen-Belsen.

Such "witnesses" have also claimed to have seen all sorts of other absurd and impossible crimes at the camps - including making soap and lampshades out of jews, electrocution and steam chambers to kill inmates, seeing "geysers" of blood spurting out of the ground, and the use of heads of babies as the ball in a soccer/football matches.

Clearly, many of the alleged eyewitnesses are liars.  Many may have indeed witnessed the delousing chambers at the camps, but they never witnessed any persons being killed in gas chambers.

Not one autopsy of any inmate showed cause of death by poison gas

As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic pathologists, performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses.  What where Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "never was a case of poison gas uncovered." [2]

Forensic analysis of the camp facilities proves that there were no homicidal gas chambers

Hydrogen cyanide gas (Zyklon B) causes the walls that come in contact with the gas to be stained a bright blue color, often referred to as "Prussian blue".  At the camps, the walls of the delousing chambers have this staining.  This is a photograph of researcher Germar Rudolf inside a small disinfestation chamber at Auschwitz where Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothing, leaving permanent blue staining on the wall.

The purported "gas chamber" at Auschwitz has no blue stains on its walls, and therefore was not used to mass murder anyone

The photo at right (taken in 2012) is of the supposed “Krema I gas chamber” at Auschwitz which is shown to tourists.  Note that there is no blue staining on the walls of the structure, proving that hydrogen cyanide gas was never used inside this facility, and that it was not used as a homicidal gas chamber.   This building was actually only a morgue and crematory, and later used as an air raid shelter.

Supposed "homicidal gas chamber" at Auschwitz was actually used as a morgue and air raid shelter

The picture at left shows the "Krema 1" supposed "gas chamber" at Auschwitz.  This building was used from 1940-1943 as a cold storage room for corpses, and contained a crematory.  From 1944-1945 it was used as an air raid shelter. As documented by historian Robert Faurisson and others, officials with the Auschwitz Museum admit that this building was altered or "reconstructed" by the Soviets and Polish Communists after the war -- notably by adding holes to the roof, where Zyklon B pellets were supposedly dropped into the room, and making other deceptive changes to trick people into believing that this building was used as a homicidal gas chamber.  The building contained no shower heads, and also contains no exhaust system or vents to remove gas from the structure.  This structure was never used to kill people via poisonous gassing.

The supposed "gas chamber" at Auschwitz was not airtight or constructed for use of poisonous gas

Pictured at right is an entrance door to what we are told was a "homicidal gas chamber" at the "Krema 1" facility at Auschwitz.  The door is made of wood, not hermetically sealed, and even contains an opening for a glass panel in the door!  Such a door could not possibly have been used in a real homicidal gas chamber.  If inmates were actually being gassed to death in this room, they could have easily broken the glass panel in the door or even kicked in and broken the wooden door.

Supposed "homicidal gas chamber" at Majdanek is actually a disinfestation gas chamber

The photo at left is the supposed "homicidal gas chamber" at the Majdanek concentration camp.  Notice the blue stains on the walls.  This building was actually a delousing chamber at the camp, used to disinfect clothing and other garments.  Also note the unbarred window in the wall of the structure, which would not be utilized if people were gassed to death in this room.

The Leuchter Report - America's foremost expert on gas chambers determines that the alleged gas chambers at the German camps could not possibly have been used to kill people

Dr. Fred Leuchter is an American expert on the technology and use of gas chambers for means of execution.  He was employed by various state governments in the United States for the design and operation of gas chambers for use in prisons to execute criminals.

In 1988 he traveled to Poland and conducted a physical and forensic examination of the alleged gas chambers at the Auschwitz and Majdanek camps.  He determined that the alleged gas chamber facilities, based upon their design and construction, "were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution".  For instance, the facilities were not hermetically sealed and did not have proper ventilation systems.

He also took samples from the walls of the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau and chemically tested the material. If the facilities were used to execute people using gas, then residue from the gas would be present in the walls.  The tests determined that hydrogen cyanide was never used inside the facilities, confirming that the facilities were never used as gas chambers.

Here is an interview (video) with Dr. Fred Leucther discussing the conclusions of his investigation.  Here is the "The Leuchter Report", with documentation of his findings.

The Holocaust lobby attacks Fred Leuchter, attempting to discredit his findings

As expected, the jewish Holocaust™ mafia launched a smear campaign to attempt to discredit the findings of the Leuchter Report.  They were successful in destroying Dr. Leuchter's career as an engineer in the construction of gas chambers.  Despite this, Dr. Leuchter has remained defiant and stands by his findings, saying:

"I have been vilified by the caretakers of the Holocaust dogma whose desperate tactics prove the failure of their arguments. My livelihood has been destroyed, my character has been impugned and my life turned upside down. But I will not bend the knee: Not now, not tomorrow, not ever. Time and reason will vindicate the Leuchter Report." [1]

Leading Austrian engineer Walter Lüftl confirms the findings of the Leuchter Report

Lüftl was a highly respected court-recognized expert engineer and cheif of a large engineering firm in Vienna.  In March of 1992, he caused a wave of controversy when he published a report entitled "Holocaust: Belief and Facts", which concluded that the stories of mass extermination of jews in gas chambers at the Auschwitz and Mauthausen camps were an impossibility, for technical reasons and because it was incompatible with the observable laws of nature.

The jewish mafia ruthlessly attacked Lüftl, and despite his outstanding reputation he was forced to resign as president of the Austrian Engineer's Chamber, a professional association of 4,000 members.  Subsequently, the Austrian police raided  Lüftl's residence for evidence in order to prosecute him for recently enacted laws making it a crime to deny the "National Socialist crimes against humanity."


Germar Rudolf confirms that there were no homicidal gassings at Auschwitz - Is imprisoned in Germany for "holocaust denial"

In 1993, German engineer and chemist Germar Rudolf tested the walls of the buildings at Auschwitz-Birkenau, and concluded that the alleged "homicidal" gas chambers on the site were never used for mass murder, since the structures did not contain the required amount of residue from the interaction of cyanide gas with the walls.  His findings are detailed in "The Rudolf Report".   In 2005, Rudolf was deported to Germany, and in 2007 he was sentenced to two and a half years in prison for "inciting racial hatred" as a result of publishing his scientific report.


No one denies that the Germans established concentration camps during World War Two where they interned various people -- including Soviet POWs, communists, and other potential enemies in a war time environment.  But as has been now exhaustively proven by brave "Revisionist" historians and researchers such as Robert Faurisson and many others, none of these camps were "extermination" or "death" camps.  They were merely internment and labor camps.  Yes, crematories were used at these camps to dispose of corpses.  But this is not proof of any nefarious purpose or mass murder.  Cremation of bodies was necessary in order to prevent spread of disease.  

There were no homicidal gas chambers at any of the German-run camps, as the Allies and jewish inmates initially falsely claimed existed at camps such as Dachau and Buchenwald - claims which have since been abandoned.  The only gas chambers at the camps were delousing or disinfestation chambers, used to kill lice and other vermin, in order to prevent the spread of typhus and other diseases.  The myth of "homicidal gas chambers" has been the result of a vicious propaganda campaign by the victorious Allies against the German people and nation.  The lie of the "holocaust" has been perpetuated via the tremendous power of the jewish-controlled establishment media and Hollywood, as well as laws in place in many European and Western nations which make it a crime to deny the "official" view on this chapter of history.  Thankfully due mostly to the internet as a bastion of freedom of speech and an alternative to jewish-controlled corporate media control, the lie of the alleged "holocaust" is being exposed for the gargantuan fraud that it is.  

Recommended Essential Reading:

1.  The 'problem of the gas chambers' by Robert Faurisson
2.  The Gas Chambers: Truth or Lie? - Interview with Robert Faurisson
3.  The "gas chamber" of Auschwitz I - Interview with Robert Faurisson

Further Reading and Resources:

1. The Leuchter Report: The End of a Myth
2. IRH: "The Leuchter Report Vindicated"
3. The Lüftl Report: An Austrian Engineer's Report on the 'Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz and Mauthausen
4. "The Auschwitz "Gas Chamber" Illusion By Nicholas Kollerstrom
5. "The German Delousing Chambers" by Friedrich Paul Berg
6.  Gas chambers that really were used by the Nazis
7.  "The Walls of Auschwitz" by Nicholas Kollerstrom
8.  A Revisionist Analysis of Majdanek Concentration Camp by Jürgen Graf
9.  The truth about the Auschwitz gas chambers (

See also:

Dachau - The U.S. Army and Government lies about "extermination" and "homicidal gas chambers" - Microcosm of the Holocaust™ Fraud
Huge smoking gun: The fake "confession" of Rudolf Höss to the "mass murder of 2.5 million jews" at Auschwitz -- Obtained via torture by jewish interrogators, and now exposed/admitted as false
The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth (Documentary film)
The Holocaust legend is built on "confessions" obtained VIA TORTURE; Jewish interrogators beat, tortured, and crushed the testicles of German defendants at war crimes trials
Treblinka - Holohoaxers say ~850,000 jews gassed to death - Australian scientists find no evidence whatsoever of mass graves
Photographs of dead bodies in mass graves are NOT proof of the "Holocaust" or any mass murder - Typhus deaths at Bergen-Belsen

Thursday, February 4, 2016

World War One Anti-German Propaganda - false atrocity stories of "bayoneting babies" and "making soap from corpses of their dead soldiers"

In war "it is necessary to invent lies about the enemy":

"During the First World War most countries publicized stories of enemy soldiers committing atrocities. It was believed that it would help persuade young men to join the armed forces. As one British general pointed out after the war: "to make armies go on killing one another it is necessary to invent lies about the enemy". These atrocity stories were then fed to newspapers who were quite willing to publish them. British newspapers accused German soldiers of a series of crimes including: gouging out the eyes of civilians, cutting off the hands of teenage boys, raping and sexually mutilating women, giving children hand grenades to play with, bayoneting babies and the crucifixion of captured soldiers." [1]

With Executive Order 2594, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson established the "Committee on Public Information" to propagandize Americans into supporting U.S. entry into the war.

"Germans were referred to collectively as the “Hun” and the “Prussian Python.” Political cartoons and posters conveyed the image of a raging beast ready to devour innocent women and children. Earlier British propaganda was released accusing German soldiers of bayoneting Belgian babies as they marched through that neutral country."[2]


A second propaganda technique used by the CPI was demonization of the enemy. "So great are the psychological resistances to war in modern nations," wrote Lasswell "that every war must appear to be a war of defense against a menacing, murderous aggressor. There must be no ambiguity about who the public is to hate." American propaganda was not the only source of anti-German feeling, but most historians agree that the CPI pamphlets went too far in portraying Germans as depraved, brutal aggressors. For example, in one CPI publication, Professor Vernon Kellogg asked "will it be any wonder if, after the war, the people of the world, when they recognize any human being as a German, will shrink aside so that they may not touch him as he passes, or stoop for stones to drive him from their path?"

A particularly effective strategy for demonizing Germans was the use of atrocity stories. "A handy rule for arousing hate," said Lasswell "is, if at first they do not enrage, use an atrocity. It has been employed with unvarying success in every conflict known to man." Unlike the pacifist, who argues that all wars are brutal, the atrocity story implies that war is only brutal when practiced by the enemy. Certain members of the CPI were relatively cautious about repeating unsubstantiated allegations, but the committee's publications often relied on dubious material. After the war, Edward Bernays, who directed CPI propaganda efforts in Latin America, openly admitted that his colleagues used alleged atrocities to provoke a public outcry against Germany. Some of the atrocity stories which were circulated during the war, such as the one about a tub full of eyeballs or the story of the seven-year old boy who confronted German soldiers with a wooden gun, were actually recycled from previous conflicts. In his seminal work on wartime propaganda, Lasswell speculated that atrocity stories will always be popular because the audience is able to feel self-righteous indignation toward the enemy, and, at some level, identify with the perpetrators of the crimes."[

British Army propagandists fabricate story that Germans used the corpses of their dead soldiers to make soap:

"One of the most notorious pieces of anti-German propaganda was the gruesome account of the “corpse exploitation establishment” operated behind the front lines by a German company. The “evil Germans” supposedly used the corpses of their own fallen soldiers for the manufacture of soap. Professor van Pelt notes that the author of this piece of lying propaganda was the Chief of Intelligence of the British Army, Brigadier General J.V. Charteris. Apparently, one of his aims was to turn the Chinese, who revere the dead, against the Germans."

A detailed account of the “corpse exploitation establishment” appeared in the respected British newspaper, The Times, on April 17, 1917. According to the story, trains full of corpses arrived at a large factory. The bodies were attached to hooks connected to an endless chain. The article states:

“The bodies are transported on this endless chain into a long, narrow compartment, where they pass through a bath which disinfects them. They then go through a drying chamber, and finally are automatically carried into a digester or great cauldron, in which they are dropped by an apparatus which detaches them from the chain. In the digester they remain from six to eight hours, and are treated by steam, which breaks them up while they are slowly stirred by the machinery.”

The article continues:

“From this treatment result several products. The fats are broken up into stearin, a form of tallow, and oils, which require to be redistilled before they can be used. The process of distillation is carried out by boiling the oil with carbonate of soda, and some of the by-products resulting from this are used by German soap makers. The oil distillery and refinery lie in the south-eastern corner of the works. The refined oil is sent out in small casks like those used for petroleum, and is of yellowish brown color.”

(The reader should note the meticulous detail!)

“It was a lie,” Dr. van Pelt emphasizes, “but it was plausible, and it was not possible to completely refute it during the [First World War].”[

WWI Anti-German Atrocity Propaganda Used As Model for WWII Anti-German Atrocity Propaganda

In fact, some of the Allied atrocity propaganda from the First World War found its mirror image in anti-German atrocity propaganda promoted by Zionist groups and other Allied sources in the Second World War.

In the August 21, 1944 issue of
, there was the “first eyewitness description” of the “Nazi extermination camp” at Maidanek concentration camp in Poland...

The article reads:

“In the center of the camp stands a huge stone building with a factory chimney—the world’s biggest crematorium. The Germans attempted to burn it but most of it still stands—a grim monument to the Third Reich.”

“Groups of 100 people would be brought here to be burned almost alive. They already had been stripped and then chlorinated in special gas chambers adjoining. The gas chambers contained some 250 persons at one time. They were closely packed…so that after they suffocated they remained standing…The human cargoes were dumped into a roaring furnace heated to 1,500 [degrees] Centigrade…[emphasis added].”

Further on “eyewitness” Karmen claims: “It is difficult to believe it myself but my eyes cannot deceive me. I see the human bones, lime barrels, chlorine pipes and furnace machinery…[emphasis added]."

The Holocaust lobby now claims that Maidanek inmates were murdered with Zyklon B/hydrogen cyanide and carbon monoxide, so the allegation that chlorine gas was the killing agent is false.

But even more importantly, consider Time's and Karmen’s description of how the corpses of the “murdered ones” were put to use: “The victims’ charred bones and ashes were moved into an adjoining department where an incredible process went on. These human bones were mechanically pulverized, placed inside large tin cans and shipped back to Germany for fertilizing the fields.”

This is false propaganda, as there is not one iota of credible evidence to support it. To be sure, the Holocaust lobby no longer claims that there was a “fertilizer factory/corpse exploitation establishment” at Maidanek, where human remains were processed, canned, and then sent back to Germany to be used as fertilizer. Yet, the reader should note how the story is strikingly similar to the aforementioned “corpse exploitation establishment” story of the First World War that van Pelt admits to be a lie. In the WWI version the corpses were utilized to make soap; the WWII version claims the bodies were used for fertilizer.

Further Reading:

1. First World War Atrocity Propaganda
2. World War One and Propaganda
3. World War I Atrocity Propaganda and the Holocaust: Is There a Lesson Here? (VHO)
4. World War I: Anti-German Propaganda

See also:

Yad Vashem, the Israeli Holyhoax museum, acknowledges that the allegations that the Germans made soap from human fat is a lie

Yad Vashem, the Israeli Holyhoax museum, acknowledges that the allegations that the Germans made soap from human fat is a lie

Yad Vashem in Jerusalem, the top Holohoax museum in the entire world, admits that the Germans never made soap from human fat during World War II.

Further Reading:

1. "Jewish Soap" by Mark Weber
2.  Zundelsite: "Jewish soap" and "lampshade" lies
3. Documents on the absurd Allied Propaganda Story that the Nazis turned Jews into Soap (David Irving)

See also:

World War One Anti-German Propaganda - false atrocity stories of "bayoneting babies" and "making soap from corpses of their dead soldiers"

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

10 Hard Facts About the Holocaust Hoax (good short overview)

Title of video in YouTube: "10 Hard Facts About the Holocaust"

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

The "Holocaust" Mythology is the lynchpin and "moral" foundation for the Jewish-Marxist agenda to destroy the European peoples and nations via multiculturalism

Source: The Occidental Observer

A Review of “Why the Germans? Why the Jews?” - Part 1

Brenton Sanderson

The culture of the Holocaust is destroying Germany. Endlessly reinforced over decades by the intellectual and media elite, the notion that Germans and their descendants are responsible for “the single most evil event in human history” has had such a demoralizing effect that millions fully support Angela Merkel’s current attempt to destroy the ethnic basis of their nation. The culture of the Holocaust has been used to devastating effect right throughout the West to stifle opposition to the Jewish diaspora strategies of mass non-White immigration and multiculturalism. “The Holocaust” is the absolute lynchpin of the White displacement agenda, with any hint of European racial or ethnic identification or solidarity being instantly linked with Auschwitz and its alleged horrors in the minds of millions (probably billions) of people.
The entire social and political order of the contemporary West — based as it is on spurious notions of racial equality and the alleged virtues of racial diversity and multiculturalism — has been erected on the moral foundations of the Holocaust. White people cannot be recognized as a group with interests because “never again.” Western nations have a moral obligation to accept unlimited non-White immigration from the Third World because “never again.” Europe must open its borders to hostile Islamic invaders because “never again.” Whites should meekly accept their deliberate displacement (and ultimate extinction) because “never again.”
Jewish historian Peter Novick has described how today’s culture of “the Holocaust” emerged as part of the collective Jewish response to the Eichmann trial in 1961–62, the Six-Day War in the Middle East in 1967, and, in particular, the Yom Kippur War in 1973. While the foundation was laid at Nuremberg in 1946, it was with these later events, and the anxieties they engendered among Jews throughout the world, that “there emerged in American culture a distinct thing called ‘the Holocaust’ — an event in its own right,” and with it a term that entered the English language as a description of all manner of horrors. From that time on, he notes, “the Holocaust” has become “ever more central in American public discourse — particularly, of course, among Jews, but also in the culture at large” and has since “attained transcendent status as the bearer of eternal truths or lessons that could be derived from contemplating it.”[i]
Novick acknowledges the primary reason for this state of affairs: that Jews, with their domination of academia and the media and entertainment industries, virtually dictate this “American” (and by extension “Western” culture) which has become so Holocaust-obsessed. He argues that the importance of the Holocaust is not a spontaneous phenomenon but stems from highly focused, well-funded efforts of Jewish organizations and individual Jews with access to the major media:
We are not just “the people of the book,” but the people of the Hollywood film and the television miniseries, of the magazine article and the newspaper column, of the comic book and the academic symposium. When a high level of concern with the Holocaust became widespread in American Jewry, it was, given the important role that Jews play in American media and opinion-making elites, not only natural, but virtually inevitable that it would spread throughout the culture at large. (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life (Mariner Books, 1999), 12)
The Jewish director Jill Soloway observed that Jews in Hollywood are “recreating culture to defend ourselves post-Holocaust.” This ethnic “defense” has entailed the intensive promotion of racial diversity and mixing, the denigration of White people and their traditional culture, the hyper-sexualization of what now passes for Western culture, the glamorizing of sexual non-conformity and the breakdown of traditional gender roles — all alongside constant reminders of “the Holocaust” with its concomitant themes of noble Jewish victimhood and unsurpassed German (White, European) evil.
Since 1945, some 148 feature films have been made about “the Holocaust” — the majority after 1970. The Jewish intellectual Chaim Bermant observed that “the Jews that came to dominate Hollywood” between them “did more to determine American attitudes and tastes than the churches or even the schools.”[ii] The psychological effects of Hollywood’s Holocaust-obsession were clear by the 1990s when one survey found that 97 percent of Americans knew what “the Holocaust” was — substantially more than knew what “Pearl Harbor” related to, or that the United States has dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, and far more than the 49 percent that knew that the Soviet Union had fought on the American side in World War Two.[iii]
Throughout the West proliferating “Holocaust” memorials and museums are lavishly funded by taxpayers, and study of “the Holocaust” in schools is mandated by law in many jurisdictions. As well as serving to morally disarm Whites concerned about their own immigrant-led displacement, the culture of “the Holocaust” is a key part of Jewish efforts to prevent intermarriage in the diaspora. Eric Goldstein, for instance, notes how “Jews discuss, read about, and memorialize the Holocaust with zeal as a means of keeping their sense of difference from non-Jews alive.”[iv]

“The Holocaust” has become, in the words of Nicholas Kollerstrom, “an ersatz substitute for genuine metaphysical knowledge,” with Auschwitz now serving as the spiritual center of a new religion and a place of awed pilgrimage for millions of penitent Europeans. The narrative has also unleashed an endless flow of money from Germany to Israel and to compensate more “Holocaust” survivors than there were ever Jews in countries under German control.[v]
Without the “Holocaust” narrative, and the veneer of moral rectitude it confers upon Jewish activism, it is doubtful the 1965 immigration laws in the United States would have passed. Likewise, the toppling of the White Australia policy just eight years later — a direct result of Jewish ethno-politics — would probably not have occurred without the moral leverage “the Holocaust” afforded Jewish activists and their non-Jewish collaborators. The leftwing Australian historian Professor Henry Reynolds has acknowledged the Jewish ethno-political (and Holocaust-centered) origins of the regnant belief in biological racial equality when he noted that: “My students often ask me how it was that people in the past held such objectionable views [about race]. They have no understanding of just how pervasive racial thought was a generation or two ago, how the Second World War and the Holocaust marked an intellectual watershed after which nothing would be the same again.”[vi]
Boasian anthropology and the “the Holocaust”  
While the Jewish critique of racialist thought, spearheaded by Franz Boas, preceded World War II  by several decades, it gained urgency following Hitler’s assumption of power in 1933. In his book Racism, posthumously published in 1938, the Jewish “sexologist” Magnus Hirschfeld set out to provide a refutation of the racial doctrines of the National Socialists. “If it were practicable,” he wrote, “we should certainly do well to eradicate the term ‘race’ as far as subdivisions of the human species are concerned.”[vii] During the war the writings of Boas, his students Ruth Benedict, Melville Herskovits and others critical of the link between race, culture and ability began to reach a mass audience. Benedict’s Races and Racism, published in 1942, dismissed racial thought as “a travesty of scientific knowledge.”[viii] In the same year, the Jewish intellectual Ashley Montagu (born Israel Ehrenberg) published Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race which became a best seller.
These Jewish ethnic activists and their allies, with their pseudo-scientific theories, were only able to reach a mass audience through the eager assistance and promotion of Jewish influence in the press and publishing houses — not because of the intrinsic merits of their arguments. As a result of these efforts, the British historian David Cannadine has noted that: “By the end of the Second World War, the notion that race was the most significant form of collective human identity, consciousness, and ranking had been stripped of any serious claim to intellectual respectability.”[ix]
In 1949 the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) convened a panel of “scientists,” chaired by Montagu, to “produce a definitive verdict on race.” One leftist historian has pointed out how the panel was comprised of “a team of ten scientists all of whom were recruited from the marginal group of anthropologists, sociologists and ethnographers who perceived the race concept primarily as a social construct.” He also notes that: “Most of these had at some point either been affiliated with the scientifically marginalized groups of cultural anthropologists that were mostly students of Franz Boas at Colombia University in New York.”[x]
After the panel’s first meeting at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris, Montagu wrote a proposal for a final statement on race during one night at a nearby hotel, and over the following days the participants discussed “the race concept” in light of Montagu’s draft.[xi] Montagu claimed that “only if our deliberations had taken place at Auschwitz or Dachau could there have been a more fitting environment to impress upon the committee members the immense significance of their work.”[xii] At that time UNESCO House was the former headquarters of the German military during its occupation of France during World War II. Underpinning the words of the UNESCO declaration “was widespread revulsion at the Jewish Holocaust.”[xiii] Leftist academic Anthony Hazard notes that “a clear rejection of anti-Semitism seemed to underline the entire effort.”[xiv]

The Montagu-led UNESCO panel’s statement (replete with falsehoods and specious arguments) was issued in 1950. “Scientists,” it claimed, “have reached general agreement in recognizing that mankind is one: that all men belong to the same species, Homo sapiens.” Genes responsible for the “hereditary differences between men” were “always few when compared to the whole genetic constitution of man and the vast number of genes common to all human beings regardless of the populations to which they belong.” It therefore followed that “the likenesses among men are far greater than their differences.” The error here is assuming that small differences in the input to a system must yield small differences in the system’s output. On the contrary, it is often the case that small differences in the input result in large differences in the final outcome. For instance, it has often been pointed out that human beings and chimpanzees differ in less than two percent of their DNA; nevertheless, the difference in intelligence between the species is enormous. Many genetic diseases are caused by a single gene, and some of these are deadly.
The UNESCO panel’s statement proposed that it would be best “to drop the term ‘race’ altogether,” since “for all practical purposes, ‘race’ is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth.” Montagu and his colleagues ended their “definitive statement on race” with a ringing endorsement of the idea of a common humanity: “Biological studies lend support to the ethic of universal brotherhood; for man is born with drives towards co-operation. … In this sense, every man is his brother’s keeper.” Here we find the invariable Jewish tendency to couch the pursuit of specific Jewish interests in a pretended universal benevolence.
UNESCO’s Montagu-drafted “definitive verdict on race,” was published with a press release with the headline: “No biological justification for race discrimination, say world scientists: Most authoritative statement on the subject.”[xv] The New York Times reported on the statement with a story whose headline proclaimed: “No Scientific Basis for Race Bias Found by World Panel of Experts.”[xvi] The UNESCO Statement on Race amounted to the foisting of a Jewish ethno-political agenda onto the global polity — with devastating consequences for the interests of Europeans.
With this new agenda now in place at the highest level, and with the demonization and marginalization of dissenters, it was almost inevitable in the decades following the defeat of Germany that the remaining policies constructed on the basis of racialist thought and identity would be dismantled. The 1950 statement on race (which contributed to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court desegregation decision in Brown v. Board of Education in Topeka) was described by one sympathetic commentator as “the triumph of Boasian anthropology on a world-historical scale.”[xvii]
Cannadine notes that, during the decades that followed, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand “abandoned their policies of racial discrimination, ended their restrictions on immigration … and embraced multiculturalism.” This misleadingly implies that these changes occurred as a result of a shift in popular sentiment, of people suddenly coming to their senses and “embracing” racial diversity. The reality in the U.S., and, as I explicated in my series of essays on Australia, was that the movement toward the liberalization of immigration policies in countries like Australia was a top-down, totally undemocratic movement pursued for specifically Jewish ends.
Götz Aly — Reinforcing the culture of “the Holocaust” in Germany
Roger Devlin has observed that “all of us in the West are supposed to be responsible for the ills of the rest of the world, but only Germans have had their identity entirely constructed on guilt for 70 years.” One of those who has worked hard to reinforce the culture of “the Holocaust” in Germany, and to entrench the climate of opinion that is leading the German people to destruction, is the University of Frankfurt historian Professor Götz Aly who has written a series of books on German “anti-Semitism,” the Third Reich and “the Holocaust.” Aly, who was involved with militant far left organizations in the sixties and seventies, is the descendent of a Turkish soldier who converted to Christianity in the seventeenth century. Despite his partial Turkish ancestry, Aly identifies as an ethnic German. He is, nevertheless, acutely critical of the German people and their history. Aly’s latest book (recently translated into English) is Why the Germans? Why the Jews? Envy, Race Hatred, and the Prehistory of the Holocaust, which is Aly’s attempt to explain “why German history culminated in genocide.”[xviii]

Unlike the bulk of establishment historians, such as the egregious Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Aly is at least willing to accept that the origins of post-Enlightenment German “anti-Semitism” can be traced to conflicts of interest between Jews and non-Jews — or rather, in his view, to the envy of average Germans at the rapid social and economic advancement of Jews in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He regards attempts to account for the rise of National Socialism solely on the basis of political ideology as unsatisfactory, observing that “conservatives weren’t the only ones guided by hostility toward and even hatred of Jews. Reformers and pioneers of political liberty often were as well. We must look for explanations elsewhere.”[xix]
Despite these small concessions to reality, Aly remains firmly within the camp of intellectual apologists for Jews in proposing that “anti-Semitism” is a phenomenon that always has its wellspring in the psychopathology or delusions of non-Jews — in this case in the pathological jealousy of Germans. His exoneration of Jews from any role whatever in contributing to manifestations of “anti-Semitism” is hardly surprising given that Aly’s book has the imprimatur of the leading Jewish representatives of the Holocaust industry. The author, who is a past winner of a Jewish Book Award, notes, for example, how his research was “made a lot easier and a lot more pleasant by my helpful and welcoming colleagues at Yad Vashem” and that his work was underwritten by the Baron Friedrich Carl von Oppenheim Stipend for Research on Racism, Anti-Semitism, and the Holocaust.
From the standpoint of an unquestioning acceptance of the dogmatic Hollywood version of “the Holocaust,” Götz Aly asserts that: “What remains contentious are questions of its ultimate meaning and deeper causes,” and argues that “the answers will, no doubt, continue to be fragmentary. Nonetheless, historians have a duty to seek them.” So, according to the author, historians have a moral and intellectual duty to search for the ultimate meaning of “the Holocaust” (provided of course this fully exonerates Jews) butnot a duty to determine the actual facts regarding the alleged event itself. So much for the once revered academic tradition of fearlessly seeking out the truth wherever it leads. In the subsequent parts of this review I critically analyze Aly’s “envy” theory of the German “anti-Semitism” which forms the basis of his much praised book.


[i] Peter Novick, The Holocaust and Collective Memory (London: Bloomsbury, 2000), 144.
[ii] Chaim Bermant, Jews (London; Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1977), 91.
[iii] Novick, Holocaust, 232.
[iv] Eric L. Goldstein, The Price of Whiteness: Jews, Race, and American Identity(New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2008), 211.
[v] Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality (Uckfield: Castle Hill, 2014), 133.
[vi] Henry Reynolds, Why Weren’t We Told? — A personal search for the truth about our history (Melbourne: Penguin, 2000), 248-249.
[vii] David Cannadine, The Undivided Past: Humanity Beyond Our Differences(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), 205.
[viii] Ibid., 210.
[ix] Ibid., 211.
[x] Poul Duedahl, “From racial strangers to ethnic minorities, On the socio-political impact of UNESCO, 1945-60.” Paper presented at 7th Annual International Conference on Politics and International Affairs in Athens, Greece, in 2009.
[xi] Ibid.
[xii] Anthony Q. Hazard, Postwar Anti-Racism: The United States, UNESCO, and “Race,”1945-1968 (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012), 38.
[xiii] Cannadine, The Undivided Past, 212.
[xiv] Hazard, Postwar Anti-Racism, 39.
[xv] Duedahl, “From racial strangers.”
[xvi] Elazar Barkan, The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 341.
[xvii] Robert Wald Sussman, The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2014), 207.
[xviii] Götz Aly, Why the Germans? Why the Jews?: Envy, Race Hatred, and the Prehistory of the Holocaust (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014), 2.
[xix] Ibid., 3.
[xx] Ibid., 1.
[xxi] Ibid., 9.
[xxii] Ibid.
[xxiii] Ibid., 110.