Tuesday, August 31, 2010

The 'Six Million' Figure Began Over 100 Years Ago




August 11, 2008
American Free Press
By Dr. Frederick Toben

Most people think that the figure "six million" emerged during World War II, when it was claimed that Germany killed that many Jews in the "Holocaust."* But the magic six-million figure dates back to 1900. Here a distinguished educator and historical investigator from Australia shows how this number first appeared in its current mystical configura- tion, as he presents sequentially items gleaned from articles published in The New York Times between 1900 and 1920.


May 7, 1920: "Jewish war sufferers in Central and Eastern Europe, where six million face horrifying conditions of famine, disease and death."


May 5, 1920: "[T]o save six million men and women in Eastern Europe from extermination by hunger and disease."


May 5, 1920: "Six million starving, fever-stricken sufferers in war-torn Europe appeal to us.


May 3, 1920: "Your help is needed to save the lives of six million people in Eastern and Central Europe.


May 2, 1920: " . . . Six million human beings, without food, shelter, clothing or medical treatment."


May 1, 1920: "But the lives of six million human beings are waiting for an answer."


Nov. 12, 1919: " . . . tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about six million souls, or half the Jewish population of the Earth . . . a million children and five million parents and elders."


Sept. 29, 1919: " . . . tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease . . . about six million souls, or half the Jewish population of the Earth."


Aug. 10, 1917: "Germans Let Jews Die. Women and Children in Warsaw Starving to Death . . . Jewish mothers, mothers of mercy, feel happy to see their nursing babies die; at least they are through with their suffering."


Jan. 14, 1915: "In the world today there are about 13 million Jews, of whom more than six million are in the heart of the war zone; Jews, whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow . . . "


But to go one step further back in time. In 1900, Rabbi Stephen Wise made the following statement for Jewish welfare organizations in the United States: "There are six million living, bleeding, suffering argu- ments in favor of Zionism."

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

The 'Holocaust' For Dummies


source: http://www.rense.com/general86/hoccl.htm

The 'Holocaust' For Dummies

Internet Sources
6-11-9

1. In 1939, there were officially nearly 15,700,000 Jews in the world.(1) After the Second World War, that number had risen to over 18,000,000 Jews.(2) What this means is that of the 15,700,000 original Jews on the planet, 6,000,000 were allegedly gassed, leaving only some 9,000,000-plus Jews on Earth. However, the world Jewish population somehow rebounded - and doubled - to over 18,000,000 in less than nine years-an astronomical feat.

2. From the beginning, there was always the 'SIX MILLION' of which 4,000,000 were allegedly gassed at Auschwitz. Then, in 1990, it was discovered that only 1.5 million were supposedly gassed at Auschwitz, a difference of 2.5 million less. Yet, the sacred Six Million figure remained untouched and unchallenged, even though no instant replacement for the 2.5 million was ever found.

3. During this time frame, the Director of the Auschwitz State Museum, Dr. Franciszek Piper, announced that the so-called gas chamber there had been fabricated by the Soviets AFTER the war (as a propaganda device to keep the world focused on the evils of Nazi Germany while the Bolshevik communists continued to consume as much of Europe as they could). Dr. Piper's statement is on videotape.

4. But there's more. The International Red Cross, formally and officially reported that less than 300,000 internees of all nationalities in the German camps died of all causes, including old age.(3) And of these, barely more than half were Jews. Most of these died in several severe typhoid epidemics caused by wartime conditions, which claimed many lives throughout Germany - including those of doctors, nurses and camp administrative personnel.

5. Even these deaths were too much for the German authorities. On December 8, 1942, Heinrich Himmler, chief commandant of all detention facilities, issued an order stating categorically: "The death rate in the camps must be reduced at all costs."

6. In all of German-occupied Europe there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war, 3.8 million Jews claimed "survivor" benefits from the German government.

7. It was a miracle. According to The New York Times of Sunday, January 4, 1987, celebrated survivor Elie Wiesel recalled "the day the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz." However, in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C., reported by the Jewish Telegraph Agency on April 11, 1983, he had a different recollection. (4) He noted that he was "one of the survivors liberated at Dachau by the U.S. Army" on April 15, 1945-and thus became the only prisoner of war to hold the distinction of being liberated from two different camps in World War II.

8. Not to be outdone by The Wiesel, famous "Nazi-hunter" Simon Wiesenthal died serenely at age 96, knowing that, according to BBC News, he had personally survived no fewer than 12 Nazi "death camps."

9. In 1948, a story appeared about a hapless Jewish girl who was done in by the Nazis. It was written with a ballpoint pen, something that did not appear on the market until after the war. It was called "The Diary of Anne Frank." This document remains highly controversial to this day.

10. So, where did this 'SIX MILLION' figure come from? For that, we must go back to one Ilya Ehrenburg (5), chief Soviet propagandist during the Second World War who later died in Israel. It was Ehrenberg who first coined the mystic number on Dec. 22, 1944 long before tens of thousands of Jewish internees in German camps, given the choice of staying to be 'liberated" by the Communists or fleeing West with their German captors, did not hesitate to choose the latter option.


You are encouraged to do you own research on these and scores of other questions relating to World War 2 and the German concentration labor camps.

Notes

1- The American Jewish Committee cites a figure of 15,688,259.

2- The Jewish-owned New York Times for Feb. 22, 1948, uses a figure of 18,700,000.

3- When the Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war, asking whether they had witnessed alleged "gassings," the response was universally negative. According to IRC document #9925, June, 1946: "The detainees themselves have not spoken of them."

4- In his book Legend of Our Time, New York, 1982, The Weasel explained: "Things are not that simple, Rebbe. Some events do take place but are not true; others are-although they never occurred."

5-The monstrous lies of this Jewish psychopath succeeded in creating a climate of rabid, anti-German hate which led to the death of millions. Here is a typical example of the genocidal daily fare served up to Soviet troops, taken from an Oct. 1944 leaflet to the Red Army: "Kill! Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn. Follow the words of Comrade Stalin and crush the fascist beast in its lair. Break the racial pride of the German woman. Take her as your legitimate booty. Kill, you brave soldiers of the glorious Soviet army!"

Friday, August 13, 2010

"Birdman's Not-Quite-95 Theses on the Holocaust" By John "Birdman" Bryant


source: http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-TheHolocaustIsABigJewishLie.html

The Holocaust Is a Jewish Big Lie: Birdman's Not-Quite-95 Theses on the Holocaust

A Modern-Day Diet of Worms Intended to Give the Holohoaxers and Their Jewish-Asskissing Retinue of True Believers a Bit of Indigestion

By John "Birdman" Bryant



Note: Recently there has been an essay making the rounds of the Net entitled '95 Theses on the Holocaust'. As JBR Yant remarked, there is nothing so inspiring as to see a good thing done poorly, and for this reason I have created my own list of Holocaust Theses, tho I have chosen not to bore the reader by trying to round out a count of 95 by digging up a bunch of marginal ones. In spite of this, however, I believe that the 55-or-over theses that are found here will keep the reader sufficiently entertained to justify his lucubrative effort during that period while he is trying to get the prunes and bran muffins to work.


Jews accuse Hitler of using, if not inventing, the Big Lie technique, but what Hitler actually did (in Mein Kampf) was to accuse the JEWS of using it. And of course Hitler was right: Not only did the Jews tell a Big Lie when they accused Hitler of doing so, but they told another one when they invented the Holocaust.

Reason 1 the JBL (Jewish Big Lie) continues: The Holocaust is a cash cow for Jews and Israel. False sympathy for Jews has given Israel hundreds of billions of dollars from Germany and the US, and has provided large incomes to individual Jews who have capitalized on the Holocaust with their novels, 'memoirs', films, plays, speaking tours and the like. It may be truly said that the Holocaust is the golden calf on the gentile leg that the Jews have been pulling for more than 60 years.

Reason 2 the JBL continues: Many countries in Europe, as well as Canada and Australia, have laws against denying the OJV (Orthodox Jewish Version of the Holocaust). There can be only one reason for these laws: Supporting a lie that is a cash cow for Jews, and preventing criticism of Jews. If the OJV were true, it would not need legislative support. Only lies need such support.

Reason 3 the JBL continues: The Holocaust is a secular religion in a secular age that keeps Jews drawn together and makes them easier for the Big Jews to manipulate.

Reason 4 the JBL continues: Once you start lying, you can't stop without admitting that you were lying, and if the Big Jews do that, then Jew-Deism -- the worship of The Chosen -- actually The SELF-Chosen -- by Jews and Christian idiots will collapse, and instead of the Chosen People, the Jews will become the Frozen People.

Reason 5 the JBL continues: Jewish scholars such as Yehuda Bauer of Yad Vashem, Israel's national Holocaust museum, have admitted that some of the most important features of the OJV are false, including the story that soap was made from the fat of Jewish bodies, and lampshades from Jewish skin. And yet in spite of these grudging admissions, the falsehoods remain firmly in place because Jews suppress the findings of Holocaust revisionists.

*******

The notion that Auschwitz was a 'death camp' is ludicrous #1: You don't build swimming pools, organize orchestras, have a camp hospital, print camp currency and establish a brothel for inmates who are going to be killed.

The notion that Auschwitz was a 'death camp' is ludicrous #2: You don't hang guards for abusing prisoners who are going to be killed, as the nazis did.

The notion that Auschwitz was a 'death camp' is ludicrous #3: High nazi muckamucks don't send around memos, as Himmler did, declaring that the death rate in the camps 'absolutely' must be reduced when the inmates are there to be killed.

The notion that Auschwitz was a 'death camp' is ludicrous #4: Auschwitz was a huge industrial center which manufactured products critical to the German war effort. Shipping people to an industrial center in order to kill them is the height of absurdity.

********

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #1: The nazis were desperate for labor, so why would they kill the very thing they were desperate for?

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #2: The ashes from such a huge collection of bodies would have inundated the surrounding countryside.

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #3: A calculation of how long it would take to incinerate such a mass of bodies would have made the operation last well into the next century.

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #4: There weren't even 6 million Jews in Europe at the time.

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #5: The World Almanac gives Jewish population figures over the war years which show an INCREASE OF JEWISH NUMBERS. Hey, but it's an old Jewish trick, like the one Jeezez did with the loaves and fishes, right?

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #6: In 1995, the plaque outside Auschwitz was changed to read 1.1 million deaths rather than 4 million, but according to Jewish mathematicians, 6 million minus 3 million is still 6 million. Hey, those big numbers can be tricky!

The notion that the nazis killed 6 million Jews does not pass the smell test #7: On two different occasions long prior to WW2, Organized Jewry claimed that '6 million Jews' had perished due to 'evil gentiles'. Clearly, the Six Million is a notion originating in Jewish mystical texts which has no basis in reality.

********

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #1: Zyklon B could not possibly have been used to gas anyone in the slow-evaporating form that it came in. It would have taken HOURS.

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #2: Zyklon B was in a form intended for use in clothing de-lousing chambers. Lice spread typhus, a big killer in war, and this de-lousing saved the lives of many lousy Jews. (Did I say that? I must be an ANTI-SEMITE! Forgive me, O Yahweh!)

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #3: Zyklon B could not possibly have been used safely to gas Jews -- it is an explosive gas, and the spark from a match or cigaret would have blown the 'gas chamber' to smithereens.

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #4: The idea that Jewish 'trusties' pulled Jewish bodies apart after gassing is ludicrous -- the gas trapped in the clothing would have killed the trusties in about 30 seconds.

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #5: The 'gas chambers' which have been shown to tourists for years were built by the Soviets, and the head of the Auschwitz museum admitted this.

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #6: Nothing about 'gas chambers' was ever mentioned in the memoirs of any of the participants in WW2, including Eisenhower, De Gaulle and Churchill.

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #7: Arno Mayer, generally accepted by establishment historians as the premier historian of the Holocaust, declared in his book Why Did the Heavens Not Darken that evidence for the existence of gas chambers was both 'rare and unreliable'.

The notion that the nazis killed people in gas chambers does not pass the smell test #8: The pictures of emaciated corpses which we have all seen are not products of gassing, but STARVATION -- starvation which occurred because there was no food for the laborers toward the end of the war. In this context it is notable that, when the camps were 'liberated', Eisenhower insisted that the liberators 'get it all on film' because 'someone in the future would deny that all this happened'. Needless to say, nobody denies the existence of 'all this', namely, the walking (and non-walking) skeletons that populated the Camps -- the revisionists just deny that 'all this' proves that the nazis were in the extermination business. In fact, 'all this' proves that the nazis WEREN'T in the extermination business -- if you are going to exterminate people, you don't build housing for them and then wait for them to starve to death -- instead, you do like Eisenhower did to the surrendered German soldiers, and put them in an open enclosure with no food or water. (Did somebody say that Ike was a war criminal? Why, that's heresy!!!)

*********

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #1: The Nuremberg laws were ex post facto laws, but ex post facto law is not only grossly unfair, but it is specifically banned by the US Constitution, and yet an American Supreme Court justice (Jackson) was the chief prosecutor.

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #2: Nazis were treated brutally and often tortured to get 'confessions'. They were not allowed reasonable legal counsel, access to documents, or any of the other amenities that are standard in Anglo-American law. And yet, even in such strained circumstances, they were still sometimes able to put American prosecutors to shame, as Goering did.

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #3: Following the trials, the transcripts of the proceedings were often doctored to cover up embarrassments, as proved by the inconsistency of the audiotapes with the transcripts.

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #4: A trial is supposed to be unbiased, but there was nothing unbiased about the Nuremberg trials. Most of the 'Americans' were actually European Jews who had gained American citizenship, but returned to Germany in order to get revenge on the nazis.

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #5: The nazis were condemned, and many hanged, for acts for which the allies were also guilty, yet no one other than nazis were tried for 'war crimes'. Furthermore, the nazis were not allowed the 'tu quoque' defense, ie, not allowed to defend themselves by bringing up the fact that they did nothing more than what the Allies did.

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #6: Julius Streicher was condemned to hang by the Nuremberg tribunal, and yet Streicher was not even a participant in the nazi government. His 'crime' was to publish a crude antisemitic newspaper and be an early supporter of Hitler. But hey, I guess all those cartoons of big noses really get to the Jews after awhile...

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #7: Wood, the hangman who dispatched the condemned nazis and a probable Jew, insured that the hanging would be brutal. Not only did he make the ropes short so that the condemned men would strangle rather than dying by neck-break, but he made the holes in the floor so small that the faces of the hanged men would be mauled as they dropped thru.

The Nuremberg trials were a farce #8: No Hitler order or anything of the kind has ever been found for extermination of the Jews, altho it is well-documented that Hitler said that the final solution to the Jewish Question should be postponed till after the war. The result is that Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg has claimed that there was a 'meeting of the minds' on the Holocaust without there ever being any specific declaration, ie, the Third Reich accomplished its alleged 'extermination' via TELEPATHY!

*******

Jews denounce the presumed genocide of Jews by the nazis, and yet are busy doing exactly that to the Palestinians. It is a psychological truism that guilty parties often accuse others of exactly what they (the guilty) are guilty of. If anyone deserves to be gassed, it is the Jews.

Jews denounce the presumed genocide of Jews by the nazis, and yet Jews practiced genocide on the Germans, as detailed by James Bacque in his chronicle of Jew Eisenhower's postwar internment camps. They also advocated it in the book 'Germany Must Perish', a book written in the WW2 period by a Jew named Kaufman, and popularized by the sycophantic praise of Jewish book reviewers.

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, and yet the major acts of brutality in the Camps were carried out by kapos -- Jewish trusties whose position gave them the power of life and death over inmates.

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, and yet Israel is the only 'Western' country that permits torture, altho the influence of the Jewish lobby and such 'legal experts' as Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz has virtually legalized it in America.

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, but deaths among American POWs held by Germany in WW2 occurred at a lower rate than in the American population as a whole. Hey, a break from all that fatty American food was just what Our Boys needed!

Jews denounce the brutality of the nazis, yet during WW2, Jewish guerrillas sunk a ship which was full of Jews bound for Palestine in order to blame it on the British and create more sympathy for Jewish immigration to Palestine, an area which was then under British control. Several similar cases of Jews killing their own for political purposes in WW2 have been reported.

Jews make much of the 'blood libel' which accuses Jews of killing gentile children and using their blood for cooking -- an accusation which is not without evidence; but Jews have in fact engaged in the greatest of all blood libels by accusing Germany of the Holocaust.

One of the greatest Jewish Holocaust legends of WW2 was the story of Anne Frank, the scion of a rich Dutch Jewish family. As it happens, however, her 'diary' upon which the legend was based was of questionable authenticity -- it was at least partly written by her father -- and in particular disguised the fact that -- far from 'hiding' from the nazis -- Anne's father was actually making a good living by supplying the nazis with food goods. For her part, Anne died in a concentration camp of typhus -- probably one of those lousy Jews.

*********

The books of Elie 'The Weasel' Wiesel provide much of the fodder for the OJV, and yet this slick Jew, whose speaking fee is $25,000 a pop plus limo, is a notorious liar. For example, he claimed to have been liberated from more than one concentration camp, to have walked around Babi Yar where he saw the ground spurt 'geysers of blood', and to have been knocked a full city block by a NY taxicab.

Elie the Weasel denounces the Germans for their behavior, and yet when he was liberated from confinement in a concentration camp, he chose not to wait for the Soviets, but rather to go west in the company of his captors. I guess he must have really loved all that torture.

Elie the Weasel was responsible for the 'Holocaust' moniker as a result of his claim that he saw Jews being thrown into pits and burned alive. Somehow, this story has now been quietly forgotten, along with others about boiling and electrocution, in favor of 'gas chambers'.

Jews are never ending in their condemnation of 'hate', particularly as represented by the Holocaust, and yet Elie the Weasel has claimed in one of his books that every Jew must hate the Germans.

********

The Third Reich cooperated with Jews to get them to emigrate to Israel. Zionist newspapers were allowed to be published, and under the Ha'avara, or Transfer Agreement, special areas were set aside in Germany to train Jews in the skills they would need in Israel, and Jews were given special financial privileges in the matter of taking their wealth out of Germany.

Jewish zionist guerrillas offered the Third Reich a military alliance during WW2.

Many Jews fought for the Third Reich, including 70 generals and many lesser types. Hitler himself was one-quarter Jewish, and in fact the grandson of a Rothschild.

The Third Reich was the recipient of significant financing by Jews.

The notorious Yellow Star, which Jews were required to wear in Germany, and which supposedly identified Jews for extermination, was actually something proposed to the nazi authorities by the Chief Rabbi of Berlin.

The only nation which has forbidden marriage between Jews and gentiles besides nazi Germany is Israel.

********

Jews had a significant role in building the atomic bomb, which was then used to create a genuine holocaust of Japenese victims. Isn't it funny that we never hear much about this very real holocaust, but we are subjected to a never-ending stream of weeping and wailing over a false one?

The only real holocaust in Germany was the firebombing of German cities by the British. In particular, 'Bomber' Harris incinerated Dresden, a city of no military importance, but one filled with civilian refugees, which killed upwards of a quarter million people.

Hitler made a good offer of peace to Britain in 1940. If Jew Churchill had accepted, the Holocaust couldn't have happened -- not that it did.

It is essential that the truth about the Holocaust be known, because the Holocaust is both the key and the Achilles heel of Jewish power over gentiles. If the Holocaust Lie collapses, then so does Jewish power.

Gentiles will stop telling unpleasant truths about Jews when Jews stop telling unpleasant lies about gentiles.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

The Incredible Jewish 'Holocaust'


source: http://www.rense.com/general91/incred.htm

The Incredible Jewish 'Holocaust'

Facts And Opinions Raise Serious Issues


From Jason Collett
8-9-10

It's Now Official - There Is No Actual Shortage

'The Israeli Prime Minister's office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million' (extract from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso, London and New York, 2000, p.83). [Google 'Holocaust survivor']

Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica
Wiesel has been one of the most prominent spokesman for the very sizeable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize..

Time Magazine, March 18 1985:

'How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? "I will never know" Wiesel says. "I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?"

Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under 'Buchenwald':

"In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions."

"A Terrible Fraud" - Wiesel Ignores Palestinians
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0199/9901055.html


Churchill And Eisenhower Reported NOTHING About A 'Holocaust'

"I've checked out the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War and - not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.

Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill's Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.

In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."

Interesting Arithmetic - The Incredible Numbers
Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel's Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true story of Auschwitz(Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).

According to Lengyel, 'After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry.' (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in 'death pits' has been found.]

This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months). Notice the bald precision of the figures without any explanation, the utter confidence in the reader's credulity.

The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: "Passionate, tormenting". Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering "You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten speak."

Could this claim be a misprint?

Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:

'Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period.' (p 118; Return to Auschwitz - paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).

According to the cover blurb, 'The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name.' 'Both engaging and harrowingan important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive' ­ Martin Gilbert, The Times.

'Sir' Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the 'Holocaust' and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes his own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:

In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states

'The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe's Jews was unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.' (p.26). [This statement, first noticed by Professor Robert Faurisson, was then deleted (not corrected) from the next edition - no simple typo, no simple error with omission or spelling or grammar, just a case of being caught red-handed in blatant chutzpah deluxe.]

If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a million a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and this does not include the amazing claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and Lengyel with Gilbert's blessing.

I sent the above note about the lies of Elie Wiesel to an anti-zionist contact in New York,
and this is the reply I received:

ha ha ha !

Well, here it is -

"Genetically" speaking I am what is commonly called a "Jew".

My last name is "_____", which was pronounced as "_____" over in the territory onced called "Austro-Hungaria".

On my mother's side of the of my family I am genetically tied to the "_____" bloodline, which is "Jewish" and has been here in America-Land, i.e. NY, i.e. "Manhattan", which initially was the Dutch Colony called "New Amsterdam". In point of fact they WERE "money changers", ha ha ha !

Back when "Haarlem" (which is Dutch for "Lovely Meadows") was pasture farmland.

So what does all this stuff have to do with the price of potatoes?

Ha Ha Ha! So glad you asked!

Throughout my life, I was inculcated with "Jewish Tradition". My upbringing was notably Christian, but many Bat Mitzvahs, etc, also comprised my life too. During the easter season, having a Passover Dinner with all the rituals was law.

Whether family members are Orthodox, moderate, or Conservative, or even Rabbis!.. NONE of them spoke of "Death Camps"...."People being thrown alive into Ovens (the so-called Holocaust or "Shoah"), and other utter nonsense. As for Gas Chambers, initially, people laughed at that nonsense.

In the early 1970's, there was a "Nazi Parade" in Illinois, where the "New Official Holocaust" pronouncements were made. I clearly remember the consternation within my family that these remarks caused. I had many relatives who SURVIVED the Nazi work camps, which was what they were called before this event.

You have to know that the Orthodox Jew members of my family don't think that the state of "Israel" should even exist! They await for an Act of God to precipitate the return of the Jews to " Israel".

When they heard of this "new history" about a "Holocaust" they simply went bonkers.

Many arguments happened and many family ties were broken over this revisionist history.

Now it is decades later and the divide within my famliy is total and permanent.

The "new History" is now the "Official History" and we are all worse off because of this fact.

Soon an "Anti-Hate Law" will be in effect.

That means that I, a "Genetic jew", who was raised a Lutheran, will PERHAPS be able to express my thoughts, but WILL be labelled a "Self-Hating Jew", and probably in need of psych-meds.

That is the long and the short of it.

I am Christian, by the way, and believe that Christ came FOR the jews.....as well as all the rest of the peoples on Planet Earth.

But don't tell any Jew that..!!

You will then be an "Anti-Semite"...whatever.

It is all a crock of shit, and will serve no good purpose, this "revamping" of actual history.

As for the Irgun and other Jewish Terrorist groups during the "founding of Israel", older relatives told me of their shock and disgust, when word came out about their activities.

Once again, whatever.

Simply puty, we are ALL rapidly "Going to Hell in a Hand-Basket", much to my dismay. And there seems to be no one that can do anything about that sad fact at all.

I'd post a video about my thoughts concerning this but I fear the usual indirect and direct physical terror tactics from the ADL, the JDL and other extremist domestic Zionist terror groups.

Godless Zionists do NOT care about "religious Jews" at all. As for "Genetic jews" like myself, they care even less.

You have to recall that Zionists brushed off massive deaths of non-Zionist Jews during WWII.

They were glad these deaths happened because they provided an impetus for Jewish migration into Palestine.

And there are too many records of their thoughts on this matter to dismiss out of hand.

that's it !

Back to work.


_______________________________________________________________


Followup to this received from Professor David O'Connell at Georgia State University:

Hi Jason,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. This man is telling it like it is. When I was a kid growing up in Brooklyn in the late 1940's and 1950s, many of the local, small businesses were owned by Jews who had come out of the camps. Candy store, dry cleaners, soda fountain, kosher butcher, podiatrist, oculist. I played with their kids. NEVER, ever, was there any talk of this Holocaust stuff. In fact, my parents, relatives and the people on my block thought the Nuremberg show trial was just that: a show that was used to justify the crimes we had inflicted on the Germans. I remember going to the movies every Sat as a kid and seeing in the newsreels what we had done to these poor people in the name of "civilization." I asked my parents where the people who had lived in these burned, flattened cities had gone, and they set about educating me at a very tender age.

Nuremberg was a state propaganda effort to brainwash us into believing that the Germans deserved what they got. But the only folks who actually believe all that nonsense are the social elites beholden to the tribe.

Regards -

David


Problems at Treblinka

A detailed forensic examination of the site of the wartime Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found no evidence of mass graves there.

For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say, more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves.

According to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (1997), for example, "a total of 870,000 people" were killed and buried at Treblinka between July 1942 and April 1943. Then, between April and July 1943, the hundreds of thousands of corpses were allegedly dug up and burned in batches of 2,000 or 2,500 on large grids made of railway ties.

Krege's team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR detects any large-scale disturbances in the soil structure to a normal effective depth of four or five meters, and sometimes up to ten meters. (GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archeologists, and police.) In its Treblinka investigation, Krege's team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples.

The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged "mass graves" portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.

"From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site," says the 30-year old Krege, who lives in Canberra. "We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether." Because normal geological processes are very slow acting, disruption of the soil structure would have been detectable even after 60 years, Krege noted.

While his initial investigation suggests that there were never any mass graves at the Treblinka camp site, Krege believes that further work is still called for.

"Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp's use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed," he says. "Personally, I don't think there was a mass extermination camp there at all."

Krege prepared a detailed report on his Treblinka investigation. He says that he would welcome the formation, possibly under United Nations auspices, of an international team of neutral, qualified specialists, to carry out similar investigations at the sites of all the wartime German camps.

My Favorite Elie Wiesel Stories

.. She explained that she had taken classes in Holocaust studies at Harvard and felt she had a good background on the subject. I wasn't talking to someone who was in the dark about what the Holocaust had been. I wanted to know what texts were followed in her classes but somehow she was unable to name them. She did recall the name of Raul Hilberg, and I was able to give her the title of his book, The Destruction of the European Jews.

"But the writer who influenced me most is Elie Wiesel."

"Is that right?" I said. "We have something in common then. I don't know who has influenced me more in the way I regard Holocaust literature than Elie Wiesel."

"Is that right?" she said enthusiastically, turning in her seat toward me.

"He's not a historian though, is he?"

She considered the question thoughtfully, "Not in a strict sense."

I told her some of my favourite Elie Wiesel stories. I started with the one where he writes that there is evidence that when some Russians were executed at Babi Yar in Ukraine that the cadavers of those who were Jews, in a unique protest against their ill treatment, spurted geysers of blood from their graves for months after they were buried.

"He wrote that in Jews of Silence," I said, "In a straight book of journalism about Soviet Jews and the refusal of the State to allow them to emigrate. Its not a book of poetry, straight journalism. What do you think about a man who would repeat such a claim? Wiesel writes in long hand in French. His wife translates his stuff into English. Presumably Wiesel goes over the translation. The translation is typeset and presumably Wiesel goes over the galleys. When he claims that the Jewish cadavers spurt geysers of blood from their graves for months after they were buried it isn't a slip of the pen. Wiesel believes that it's a credible story. He wants you and me to believe it's credible. He wants the kids he teaches at Boston University to believe it's credible. It isn't only that Wiesel is not a historian. There may be other things as well that he is not. He may not be wrapped too tight, for example."

The girl didn't say anything.

I told her some more of Elie Wiesel stories. I took them largely from his recommended reading list of survivor eyewitness testimonies. I told them as amusingly as I could, and as gently as I could. As I went along I introduced a few observations about the gas chamber stories from a Revisionist perspective. Occasionally she would smile or ask a question, but as I talked on she grew increasingly silent. After three or four hundred miles I had the feeling I had said enough, but I couldn't stop myself. The longer I talked the more investment I had in wanting her to see what good sense I was making.

I told her about how Wiesel especially recommends the eyewitness testimony of Yankiel Wiernik as evidence for the gas chambers at Treblinka and the extermination there of about a million Jews. I told her how Wiernik claims that he saw with his own eyes how the cadavers of pregnant Jewish women that had been exterminated would burst open while they were being crematedtheir bellies would burst openand that inside their wombs you could see their fetuses burning like torches.

I said, "Here is the question I think Elie Wiesel's students should pose to him: As the Americans and the British each specialized in burning alive German and Japanese women by the ten thousands in mass terror bombings, and as there are no reports that pregnant German or Japanese women were able to mount such displays with their own wombs and fetuses while their own bodies were in flames, as Yankiel Wiernik ­ is Elie Wiesel ­ suggesting that only Jewish ladies have the talent for it? What is it that Wiesel is attempting to suggest when he recommends Wiernik's eyewitness testimony to his students at Boston University? What does he reveal about his standards for historical objectivity? What does he reveal about his inner life?"

At that moment the girl took her head in both hands, put her face on her knees and moaned: "I just feel like I'm being proselytized," she said. She shook her head slowly from side to side, still holding it in both hands, doubled over in her seat.

www.codoh.com



Extract from Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist

By Bradley R. Smith

Another wonderfully far-fetched tale of the 'Holocaust'...

Why One Auschwitz Survivor Avoided Doctors for 65 Years

By Christoph Schult

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,666327,00.html

Sixty-five years ago, infamous Auschwitz doctor Josef Mengele removed Yitzhak Ganon's kidney without anesthesia. The Greek-born Jew swore never to see a doctor again -- until a heart attack last month brought his horrific tale into the open.

To: letters@nytimes.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 13, 2009 9:16 am
Subject: '' Yitzhak Ganon ''

To The Editor:
Let me see if I understand the article that appeared in today's Times about Holocaust survivor Yitzhak Ganon's aversion to doctors. ( ''Heart Treated, Old Wound Opened'' : NY Times , Dec. 13, 2009 ). According to the article Yitzhak was so traumatized by having his kidney removed by the infamous Dr. Mengele without anesthesia some 65 years ago while an inmate at Auschwitz that he refused to ever visit a doctor again. ''Mr. Ganon was tied down on a table, and without anesthesia was cut open by Dr. Mengele, who then removed a kidney. ''I saw the kidney pulsating in his hand and cried like a crazy man '' Mr. Ganon said.
Although expected when dealing with claims of Holocaust survivors, it is still astonishing that, that the America's so-called ''newspaper of record'' would set aside accepted practices and procedures of journalism and not challenge such an outrageous assertion. For one thing , a ''removed kidney would not pulsate'', but more importantly a kidney removal without anesthesia would have most certainly killed him. To its credit the Times story omitted another claim reported by some of the wire service versions of the story that he was sent back to work within days of the operation. Neither did the Times include the claim that the reason he survived was that he was # 201 on the line for the gas chamber whose capacity was 200. (Shouldn't he then have been the first to go with the next batch of 200? ) -- giuseppe furioso

Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition

To be sure, false Holocaust memoirs are hardly a recent phenomenon (Next time, Art Spiegelman, do a little research-there was no concentration camp called "Mauschwitz."). But in recent years, they seem to have become both more common and more crappy. It's no longer enough to simply say you were in a concentration camp, like Fauxlocaust survivor Benjamin Wilkomirski. No, now you need to have been led across Europe by wolves, or have a chance encounter years later that results in your marriage to the hidden Jewish girl who saved you. Bad enough that these assorted frauds and lunatics should spew this nonsense, but do they have to do such a bad job of it? Have they no shame?

The answer, of course, is that they don't. And so while the rest of the world may turn away or offer the occasional book deal, we cannot remain silent (much less offer a book deal). What we can-no, must-do, is confront this dangerous trend the only way we know how-with a self-aggrandizing and somewhat offensive publicity stunt.

And thus, we unveil the Heeb Magazine Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition. Simply write a fake Holocaust Memoir recounting your tale of Holocaust survival, get it to us by April 1, and let us do the rest, which, in this case, involves reading your submissions choosing a winner, announcing the winner on Yom Hashoah (April 21) and publishing the winning entry in the subsequent issue of Heeb. You're reading that correctly. You could be published in Heeb Magazine, and who knows-maybe you could be on Oprah, too?

Contest Rules

1. All entries must be received by April 1, 2009.

2. Entries should be emailed to info@heebmagazine.com with the subject line "Heeb Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition" or sent to: Heeb Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition, P.O. Box 687, New York, New York, 10012.

3. Entries may be of any length, but we should tell you that our years of watching TV have really shot our attention span all to hell.

4. Although real Holocaust survivors may enter, the memoirs themselves must be fake.

5. No erotic fan fiction

6. No close friends or relatives of Alex Trebek

7. We reserve the right to mock any and all entries.

8. We reserve the right to publish and mock the winning entry.

9. "Memoirs" shall be defined as a form of writing, not a collage, short film or interpretive dance piece.

10. Jewdar will be the sole arbitrator of entries, and will decide the winner. Don't be too shocked if it's Jewdar's.

11. No parking baby. No parking on the dance floor.

12. No use of the words "tumescent," "engorged" or "moist," unless they are referring to cake

13. No previously published fake Holocaust memoirs

14. All entries must be the original creations of the entrant.

15. We are not liable for anything, anytime, anywhere, no givesies backsies, infinity.

jewdar Posted on February 09, 2009
Bradley R. Smith - CODOH
Website of Holocaust revisionist Bradley R. Smith and the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH). CODOH encourages a free and open debate on the holocaust.

www.codoh.com/
http://www.codoh.com/index2.shtml

"Revisionism means nothing more or less than the effort to correct the historical record."
...Harry Elmer Barnes

America's most successful revisionist activist, Bradley Smith, writes simply but strongly on how the Holocaust taboo blinds professors, journalists, politicians, and the human rights community to their responsibilities to encourage a free flow of ideas. In this Blog Smith reveals himself in the light of day in a way that his most vociferous critics would not dream of attempting. They have their reasons.

www.codohfounder.com

The Holocaust Controversy - A Case for open Debate
http://www.vho.org/
THE CONTEMPORARY ISSUE

Is asking questions a crime? If you develop doubts about the Holocaust, isn't the only way to get rid of these doubts by asking questions? A lot of individuals and groups are enraged by those who ask critical questions about the Holocaust. These doubters, who call themselves Revisionists, are often defamed as "Holocaust deniers."

Every other historical issue is debated as a matter of course, but influential pressure groups have made the Holocaust story an exception. Anyone should be encouraged to investigate critically the Holocaust story in the same way they are encouraged to investigate every other historical event. This is not a radical point of view. The culture of critique was developed millennia ago by Greek philosophers like Socrates, and was renewed centuries ago during the Enlightenment.

THE HISTORICAL ISSUE

Revisionists agree with establishment historians that the German National Socialist State singled out the Jewish people for special and cruel treatment. In addition to viewing Jews in the framework of traditional anti-Semitism, the National Socialists also saw them as being an influential force behind international communism and behind the so-called international "finance capital," which they held responsible for the worldwide economic crisis and for the impoverishment of German workers. During World War II, Jews were considered to be enemies of the German State and a potential danger to its war efforts, much like the Germans, Italians, and Japanese were viewed in the U.S. Consequently, Jews were stripped of their rights, forced to live in ghettos, conscripted for labor, deprived of their property, deported, and otherwise mistreated. Many tragically perished.

In contrast to establishment historians, Revisionists claim that the German State had NO policy to exterminate the Jewish people (or anyone else) in homicidal gas chambers or by killing them through abuse or neglect. Revisionists also maintain that the figure of six million Jewish deaths is an irresponsible exaggeration, and that no execution gas chambers existed in any camp in Europe which was under German control. Fumigation gas chambers, both stationary and mobile, did exist to delouse clothing and equipment to prevent disease at POW, labor, and concentration camps and at the fighting front. It is highly likely that it was from this lifesaving procedure that the myth of extermination gas chambers emerged.

We've all seen "The Photographs." Endlessly. Newsreel photos taken by U.S. and British photographers at the liberation of the German camps, and especially the awful scenes at Dachau, Buchenwald, and Bergen-Belsen. For instance, look at the one at the top of this leaflet. These photos and films are usually presented in a way in which it is either stated or implied that the scenes resulted from deliberate German policies. The photographs are real, but their interpretation is false.

Even mainstream historians admit that there was no German policy at any of those camps to kill the internees. In the last months of the war, while Soviet armies were invading Germany from the east, British and U.S. bombers were destroying every major city in Germany with saturation bombing. Transportation, the food distribution system, medical, and sanitation services all broke down. That was the purpose of these air raids, which was the most barbaric form of warfare in Europe since the Mongol invasion.

Millions of refugees fleeing the Soviet armies were pouring into central and western Germany. As a result of the ongoing war, of starvation, and epidemics, millions of civilians were dying all over Germany. The camps were not exempted from this tragedy. Camps that were still under German control were overcrowded with internees evacuated from the east. By early 1945, these inmates suffered from malnutrition and epidemics like typhus and cholera, to which many succumbed. When the press entered the camps with British and U.S. soldiers, they found the results of that. They took "The Photographs."